Community supported agriculture (CSA)

Evidence Rating
Evidence rating: Some Evidence

Strategies with this rating are likely to work, but further research is needed to confirm effects. These strategies have been tested more than once and results trend positive overall.

Disparity Rating
Disparity rating: Potential to decrease disparities

Strategies with this rating have the potential to decrease or eliminate disparities between subgroups. Rating is suggested by evidence, expert opinion or strategy design.

Community Conditions
Authors
Lead:
Bomi Kim Hirsch
Contributor(s):
Kiersten Frobom
Acknowledgements:
Travis Austin, Alison Bergum, Lael Grigg, Jessica Solcz
Date last updated

Community supported agriculture (CSA) is a partnership between farmers and consumers, where consumers purchase a share of a farm’s products in advance, typically paying in full in the wintertime when farms need capital to prepare for the spring. During the high growing season (roughly May to October), CSA members receive deliveries of vegetables, fruits, and herbs; some CSAs include other farm products such as eggs, meat, milk, cheese, flowers, or baked goods. CSA programs vary by farm and community, though most feature organic, sustainably raised products, and have pick-up locations in nearby neighborhoods and on the farm. Most CSA programs encourage members to participate in community-building opportunities on the farm with other members; some also encourage members to work on the farm in exchange for reduced membership costs1, 2. Some CSA programs partner with non-profit organizations to offer working shares, flexible payment plans, or other lower cost options3, 4. Some programs provide subsidies of a portion of the share price for participants with limited resources3; some employers offer incentive vouchers to encourage employees’ participation in CSA programs5.

What could this strategy improve?

Expected Benefits

Our evidence rating is based on the likelihood of achieving these outcomes:

  • Increased access to healthy food

  • Increased healthy food consumption

Potential Benefits

Our evidence rating is not based on these outcomes, but these benefits may also be possible:

  • Reduced food insecurity

  • Strengthened local & regional food systems

  • Reduced emissions

  • Increased earnings

What does the research say about effectiveness?

There is some evidence that subsidized or incentivized community supported agriculture (CSA) programs can increase access to and consumption of healthy foods, including fruit and vegetables3, 5, 6, 7, 8. Such CSA programs may increase the variety and amount of fruit and vegetables consumed among participating adults with low incomes3, 6, 8. Additional evidence is needed to confirm effects, including differences among CSA models and health outcomes in the long-term.

Subsidized CSA programs with tailored nutrition education, designed for households with low incomes in rural and micropolitan communities, may improve cooking confidence and skills, fruit and vegetable intake, and physical activity among adult caregivers after one season of participation3. Such programs are associated with caregivers’ more frequent fruit and vegetable preparation as children’s snacks9; however, overall effects on children from families with low incomes are unclear3, 10. Community health center-based subsidized CSA programs may improve healthy eating among adults6, 8. Employer-based incentivized CSA programs that offer on-site share pick-ups may increase participants’ access to fresh produce, the amount and variety of fruits and vegetables consumed5, 11, 12, 13, household food purchasing and interest in nutrition11, 12, and may reduce diet-related medical claims5.

Subsidized CSA programs seem to strengthen participants’ social connections with farmers and communities14. Such programs have the potential to reduce food insecurity among households with low incomes3, 6, 15 and help households with low incomes meet recommended levels for vegetable consumption10. However, CSAs alone may not fully address food insecurity problems without consideration of community investments and health care policies16.

In general, CSA participation may also improve health status7, especially among participants who report lower than average health prior to CSA enrollment11, 17. Participation is associated with improved diet18, 19, more cooking at home19, 20, 21, 22, and in some cases, improved weight status or body mass index (BMI)3, 6, 18. Households with low incomes are more likely to report improved diet, increased consumption of vegetables, less time spent shopping, and less money spent on food after CSA participation compared to households with higher incomes23. The number of CSA programs and farmers markets per 100,000 state residents do not seem to be associated with state-level physical wellbeing: the location and accessibility of CSAs and farmers markets, local and regional food systems, and policies supporting fresh and healthy food appear to play a more critical role in residents’ wellbeing16.

CSA programs may strengthen and improve local and regional food systems, contribute to greater food system sustainability24, 25, and enhance economic sustainability as they distribute fresh fruits and vegetables from local farms to urban and rural areas in the same region and shorten the food supply chain19, 26, 27. CSA programs offering sustainably produced, seasonal food may reduce emissions from fossil fuels used to produce, process, and transport food28, 29, 30. Most CSA farms use environmentally friendly farming practices that improve soil properties and support biodiversity24. CSA participation may also reduce the energy intensity of an individual’s diet if more plant-based foods are consumed in place of animal products28.

Farmers perceive CSA participation as an overall benefit to their business despite the additional burden on farmers’ time and resources31. For farmers, the CSA prepayment model can increase cash flow, provide a stable income, and transfer some production risk to consumers21, 32. Member turnover from year to year can be a challenge7; however, for some groups, using a pay-as-you-go model may increase membership33. Administrative burdens such as changing logistics and keeping track of participants can also be a challenge to CSA farmers34. Researchers recommend ensuring sustainable income opportunities for CSA farmers26.

Barriers to CSA participation can include the time and knowledge required to prepare whole foods19, 35, long distances to pick up locations, transportation issues, parking difficulties, work schedules, and child care challenges23, 36, 37. Interviews with rural households with low incomes suggest cost, accessibility, and produce selection and quality can also be barriers38. Concerns about food convenience and affordability seemed to limit participation in one employer-sponsored CSA program39. To reduce some of these barriers, experts recommend flexible distribution practices including self-selection of fruits and vegetables, outreach about produce seasonality and CSA programs, education and tools to assist with fruit and vegetable preparation, subsidies for families who experience financial difficulties26, 38, sliding scale pricing, and Electronic Benefits Transfer (EBT) acceptance for CSA payments23.

Environmental and nutritional motivations are associated with choosing to participate in a CSA program7, 32, 40. Individuals who are younger, have higher incomes, support sustainable agriculture, and view communication with CSA farms positively are more likely to renew their CSA memberships41, 42. Increasing food variety and quantity, providing convenient pick-up times, and fostering cooperation among CSA farms may support CSA member retention26, 43.

Subsidized CSA programs appear to be cost-effective for both the agricultural sector and health care by increasing farmers’ economic benefits and reducing long-term rates of cardiovascular disease and diabetes among participants with low incomes44. An analysis of the Farm Fresh Foods for Healthy Kids initiative, a subsidized CSA, shows that such interventions are cost-effective by increasing caregivers’ fruit and vegetable intake and reducing household food insecurity15.

How could this strategy advance health equity? This strategy is rated potential to decrease disparities: supported by some evidence.

There is some evidence that subsidized or incentivized community supported agriculture (CSA) programs have the potential to decrease socioeconomic disparities in access to and consumption of healthy foods5, 6, 15, 56. In general, CSA programs can help reconnect urban and rural places and residents26. CSA programs have the potential to strengthen local food systems and promote human capital in rural communities by creating jobs, social connections, and delivering health and nutrition education57. Nutrition interventions such as CSAs and healthy food boxes may strengthen local food systems through partnerships with farmers from racial and ethnic minority groups and can improve access to healthy foods for households with low incomes58, 59.

In the U.S., CSA farmers continue to face a gender pay gap and insufficient livable incomes24, 60, even though CSA programs may contribute modestly to increased earnings for women farmers61. CSA participants tend to be white, female, and frequently have higher education, higher incomes7, 23, 62, and stronger levels of social connectedness than non-participants40. In the traditional CSA model, CSA participants usually need to make payments in advance of the growing season3. Without subsidized CSA shares, households with low incomes typically cannot afford to participate19, 21, 35. Limited confidence in food preparation and low familiarity with CSA programs seem to discourage participation among households with low incomes63. To advance social justice, researchers recommend supporting farmers’ livelihoods and promoting inclusive membership across race, income, and gender groups26.

What is the relevant historical background?

Throughout U.S. history, discriminatory housing, lending, and exclusionary zoning policies entrenched racial residential segregation and concentrated poverty64, 65. This systemic disinvestment and exclusion by both government and private entities created and maintains community environments with limited resources, deteriorating infrastructure, hazardous industries and waste disposal sites, and many other factors that lead to poorer health outcomes for people of color and people with low incomes66, 67, 68, 69. Communities shaped by discriminatory policies are often areas that have limited access to healthy and affordable food, formerly known as food deserts70, 71. Individuals who live in these communities face higher food costs, fewer store options, and must travel further to purchase healthy food than those who live in well-resourced communities70. Residents also have increased exposure to high calorie foods that have little nutritional value, which often leads to worse health outcomes71. Many rural areas also lack access to fresh and affordable food, even in areas where farming is an important part of the local economy72. It is crucial to recognize food insecurity as a public health issue where economic, social, and health factors intersect. Therefore, addressing food insecurity requires a multi-level, comprehensive approach involving strengthening social safety nets, tackling systemic inequities, and integrating health care73.

Community supported agriculture (CSA) was developed as an alternative farming model to conventional farming practices and inadequate food supply within the industrial food system60. In the U.S., the first CSA farms emerged in the 1980s60. CSAs seek to ensure just incomes for farmers as well as consumers’ right to access healthy food74. CSA interventions can meet needs among consumers, support individuals and communities, and improve social relations26. However, CSA membership is largely made up of households with above-average income and education, while participation among households with low incomes is minimal. Efforts to promote membership diversity and social inclusion in CSAs include government- or community-based financial support, multi-tiered membership fees, trial memberships, and incorporating CSAs into government-administered food justice programs74.

Equity Considerations
  • Who faces food insecurity in your community? In what ways can CSA programs increase participation among individuals and households (e.g., diverse payment options, greater choice of produce, multiple pick-up locations, financial and transportation support, and cooking and nutrition education)?
  • If CSA programs are available in your community, who leads them and how do they sustain their operations? Is public or private funding available to support CSA program expenses (e.g., advertising)? How can residents in your community participate in developing CSA programs that are culturally inclusive and responsive to local needs?
  • What barriers or challenges to CSA programs do farmers experience? What supports and partnerships are needed to address these barriers and secure adequate incomes for CSA farmers?
Implementation Examples

As of 2020, over 7,200 farms in the U.S. reported selling products through a community supported agriculture (CSA) program. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) links to several searchable databases for CSA programs at the national, state, and regional levels1.

State legislation can support farmers markets and CSA programs, as in Oregon45. In California, CSA vendors can apply for and receive a machine for free that allows them to accept Electronic Benefits Transfer (EBT) payments for CSA shares23. City ordinances can also be adjusted to permit or encourage residents to host CSA pick-ups or to sell produce at their residences, as in Kansas City, Missouri46.

Many non-profit organizations work to connect consumers with CSA programs and to improve the accessibility of CSA shares through education, outreach, community building, and resource sharing; examples include the FairShare CSA coalition in Madison, Wisconsin2; the Portland Area CSA coalition47; the Food Project in the Boston-area48; and Local Harvest, a national organization49.

CSA programs around the country are working to reach consumers with low incomes from diverse backgrounds. For example, Corbin Hill Food Project in New York City is a year-round farm share program that connects farms to residents with low incomes and communities of Black, Latino, and immigrants50. It offers weekly subscriptions, subsidized and sponsorship shares, flexible payment options that accept EBT payment and foods reflecting diverse cultures51. The Harvest Share CSA is a subsidized CSA program that provides culturally adapted produce and recipes to Asian American households in Brooklyn52. Zenger Farm in Portland, OR accepts EBT payments, has sliding scale pricing, and offers one-week trial shares53. Clagett Farm in Maryland offers reduced-price shares and workshares, and their full-price memberships fund shares for households with low incomes through From the Ground Up, a collaboration with a local food bank that distributes shares and offers educational programming and farm visits54. Philly Foodworks partners with Greensgrow, an urban farm and garden in Philadelphia, to offer discounted CSA shares for Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) participants55.

Many health insurance providers offer consumers rebates for purchasing CSA vegetable shares2. The Farm to Work program in Texas is a modified CSA which allows employees to order fresh produce baskets from local farmers which are then delivered to their worksite13.

Implementation Resources

Resources with a focus on equity.

USDA NAL-CSA - U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), National Agricultural Library (NAL). Community supported agriculture (CSA).

LHC-Rockeymoore 2014 - Rockeymoore M, Moscetti C, Fountain A. Rural childhood obesity prevention toolkit. Leadership for Healthy Communities (LHC), Center for Global Policy Solutions, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation; 2014.

ISU-Food and sustainability resources - Iowa State University (ISU), Sustainable Food Processing Alliance. Online resources for food and sustainability.

Footnotes

* Journal subscription may be required for access.

1 USDA NAL-CSA - U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), National Agricultural Library (NAL). Community supported agriculture (CSA).

2 FairShare-How it works - FairShare CSA Coalition. About CSA: How it works.

3 Seguin-Fowler 2021 - Seguin-Fowler, R. A., Hanson, K. L., Jilcott Pitts, S. B., Kolodinsky, J., Sitaker, M., Ammerman, A. S., Marshall, G. A., Belarmino, E. H., Garner, J. A., & Wang, W. (2021). Community supported agriculture plus nutrition education improves skills, self-efficacy, and eating behaviors among low-income caregivers but not their children: A randomized controlled trial. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 18(1), 112. 

4 Forbes 2008 - Forbes CB, Harmon AH. Buying into community-supported agriculture: Strategies for overcoming income barriers. Journal of Hunger & Environmental Nutrition. 2008;2(2-3):65-79.

5 Rossi 2021 - Rossi, J., & Woods, T. (2021). Incentivizing wellness through community supported agriculture: Reflections on shareholder impacts of an employer-based CSA voucher program. Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development, 11(1), 27-44.

6 Berkowitz 2019 - Berkowitz, S. A., O'Neill, J., Sayer, E., Shahid, N. N., Petrie, M., Schouboe, S., Saraceno, M., & Bellin, R. (2019). Health center–based community-supported agriculture: An RCT. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 57(6), S55-S64.

7 Vasquez 2017 - Vasquez A, Sherwood NE, Larson N, et al. Community-supported agriculture as a dietary and health improvement strategy: A narrative review. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. 2017;117(1):83-94.

8 Izumi 2020 - Izumi, B. T., Martin, A., Garvin, T., Higgins Tejera, C., Ness, S., Pranian, K., & Lubowicki, L. (2020). CSA partnerships for health: outcome evaluation results from a subsidized community-supported agriculture program to connect safety-net clinic patients with farms to improve dietary behaviors, food security, and overall health. Translational Behavioral Medicine, 10(6), 1277–1285.

9 Marshall 2023 - Marshall, G. A., Garner, J. A., Hanson, K. L., Ammerman, A. S., Jilcott Pitts, S. B., Kolodinsky, J., Sitaker, M., & Seguin-Fowler, R. A. (2023). Fruit and vegetable preparation changes during and after cost-offset community-supported agriculture plus nutrition education. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 55(8), 575-584.

10 Hanson 2017 - Hanson KL, Kolodinksy J, Wang W, et al. Adults and children in low-income households that participate in cost-offset Community Supported Agriculture have high fruit and vegetable consumption. Nutrients. 2017;9(7):726

11 Rossi 2017 - Rossi JJ, Woods TA, Allen JE. Impacts of a Community Supported Agriculture (CSA) voucher program on food lifestyle behaviors: Evidence from an employer-sponsored pilot program. Sustainability. 2017;9(9):1543

12 Vasquez 2016 - Vasquez A, Sherwood NE, Larson N, et al. A novel dietary improvement strategy: Examining the potential impact of community-supported agriculture membership. Public Health Nutrition. 2016;19(4):2618-2628.

13 Thi 2015 - Thi CA, Horton KD, Loyo J, et al. Farm to work: Development of a modified Community-Supported Agriculture model at worksites, 2007–2012. Preventing Chronic Disease. 2015;12:150022.

14 Martin 2021c - Martin, A., Coplen, A., Lubowicki, L., & Izumi, B. (2021). A photovoice inquiry into the impacts of a subsidized CSA program on participants’ health. Health Education & Behavior, 49(5), 820-827.

15 Garner 2023 - Garner, J. A., Hanson, K. L., Jilcott Pitts, S. B., Kolodinsky, J., Sitaker, M. H., Ammerman, A. S., Kenkel, D., & Seguin-Fowler, R. A. (2023). Cost analysis and cost effectiveness of a subsidized community supported agriculture intervention for low-income families. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 20(1), 84. 

16 Kraeger 2024 - Kraeger, P., Phillips, R. G., Lubin, J. H., Weir, J., & Patterson, K. (2024). Assessing healthy effects between local level farmer’s markets and community-supported agriculture and physical well-being at the state level. Sustainability, 16(2), 867.

17 Allen 2017 - Allen JE, Rossi J, Woods TA, et al. Do Community Supported Agriculture programmes encourage change to food lifestyle behaviours and health outcomes? New evidence from shareholders. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability. 2017;15(1):70-82

18 Minaker 2014 - Minaker LM, Raine KD, Fisher P, et al. Food purchasing from farmers' markets and Community-Supported Agriculture is associated with reduced weight and better diets in a population-based sample. Journal of Hunger & Environmental Nutrition. 2014;9(4):485-497.

19 Harmon 2014 - Harmon AH. Community supported agriculture: A conceptual model of health implications. Austin Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences. 2014;2(4):1024.

20 Wharton 2015 - Wharton CM, Hughner RS, MacMillan L, Dumitrescu C. Community supported agriculture programs: A novel venue for theory-based health behavior change interventions. Ecology of Food and Nutrition. 2015;54(3):280-301.

21 Andreatta 2008 - Andreatta S, Rhyne M, Dery N. Lessons learned from advocating CSAs for low-income and food insecure households. Southern Rural Sociology. 2008;23(1):116-148.

22 Cohen 2012b - Cohen JN, Gearhart S, Garland E. Community supported agriculture: A commitment to a healthier diet. Journal of Hunger & Environmental Nutrition. 2012;7(1):20-37.

23 Galt 2017 - Galt RE, Bradley K, Christensen L, et al. What difference does income make for Community Supported Agriculture (CSA) members in California? Comparing lower-income and higher-income households. Agriculture and Human Values. 2017;34(3):435-452.

24 Egli 2023 - Egli, L., Rüschhoff, J., & Priess, J. (2023). A systematic review of the ecological, social and economic sustainability effects of community-supported agriculture. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 7.

25 Forssell 2015 - Forssell S, Lankoski L. The sustainability promise of alternative food networks: An examination through 'alternative' characteristics. Agriculture and Human Values. 2015;32(1):63-75.

26 Mert-Cakal 2021 - Mert-Cakal, T., & Miele, M. (2021). Community-supported agriculture (CSA): Significance and prospects for growth for individuals, communities, and food systems. CABI Reviews, 16(061). 

27 CDC-Local foods - The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Healthy places: Farmers markets, community supported agriculture, and local food distribution.

28 Ringling 2020 - Ringling KM, Marquart LF. Intersection of diet, health, and environment: Land grant universities’ role in creating platforms for sustainable food systems. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems. 2020;4(70).

29 Christensen 2017 - Christensen LO, Galt RE, Kendall A. Life-cycle greenhouse gas assessment of Community Supported Agriculture in California's Central Valley. Renewable Agriculture and Food System; 2017.

30 CCAFS-Campbell 2012 - Campbell B. Is eating local good for the climate? Thinking beyond food miles. Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS), CGIAR Research Programs. 2012.

31 Sitaker 2020 - Sitaker, M., McCall, M., Belarmino, E., Wang, W., Kolodinsky, J., Becot, F., McGuirt, J., Ammerman, A., Jilcott Pitts, S., & Seguin-Fowler, R. (2020). Balancing social values with economic realities: Farmer experience with a cost-offset CSA. Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development, 9(4), 29-43.

32 Zepeda 2014 - Zepeda L, Reznickova A, Russell WS, Hettenbach D. A case study of the symbolic value of Community Supported Agriculture membership. Journal of Food Distribution Research. 2014;42(2):195-212.

33 Freedman 2016 - Freedman MR, King JK. Examining a new “pay-as-you-go” Community-Supported Agriculture (CSA) model: A case study. Journal of Hunger and Environmental Nutrition. 2016;11(1):122-145.

34 Jilcott Pitts 2022 - Jilcott Pitts, S. B., Volpe, L. C., Sitaker, M., Belarmino, E. H., Sealey, A., Wang, W., Becot, F., McGuirt, J. T., Ammerman, A. S., Hanson, K. L., Kolodinsky, J., & Seguin-Fowler, R. (2022). Offsetting the cost of community-supported agriculture (CSA) for low-income families: perceptions and experiences of CSA farmers and members. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 37(3), 206–216.

35 Kato 2013 - Kato Y. Not just the price of food: Challenges of an urban agriculture organization in engaging local residents. Sociological Inquiry. 2013;83(3):369-391.

36 McGuirt 2019 - McGuirt, J., Sitaker, M., Pitts, S. J., Ammerman, A., Kolodinsky, J., & Seguin-Fowler, R. (2019). A mixed-methods examination of the geospatial and sociodemographic context of a direct-to-consumer food system innovation. Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development, 9(A), 159–177. 

37 Quandt 2013 - Quandt SA, Dupuis J, Fish C, D'Agostino RB. Feasibility of using a community-supported agriculture program to improve fruit and vegetable inventories and consumption in an underresourced urban community. Preventing Chronic Disease. 2013;10:130053.

38 Hanson 2019 - Hanson KL, Garner J, Connor LM, et al. Fruit and vegetable preferences and practices may hinder participation in Community-Supported Agriculture among low-income rural families. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior. 2019;51(1):57-67.

39 Rossi 2025 - Rossi, J., Pierce, T., Zhao, S., & Woods, T. A. (2025). Understanding consumer values of participants in a cost-offset community supported agriculture (CSA) program. Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development, 14(3), 393-413.

40 Farmer 2014 - Farmer JR, Chancellor C, Robinson JM, West S, Weddell M. Agrileisure: Farmers markets, CSAs, and the privilege in eating local. Journal of Leisure Research. 2014;46(3):313-328.

41 Chen 2019 - Chen, J., Gao, Z., Chen, X., & Zhang, L. (2019). Factors affecting the dynamics of community supported agriculture (CSA) membership. Sustainability, 11(15), 4170.

42 Witzling 2020 - Witzling, L,. Shaw, B. R., Strader, C., Sedlak, C., & Jones, E. (2020). The role of community: CSA member retention. British Food Journal, 122(7), 2289–2302.

43 Galt 2019 - Galt, R. E., Van Soelen Kim, J., Munden-Dixon, K., Christensen, L. O., & Bradley, K. (2019). Retaining members of community supported agriculture (CSA) in California for economic sustainability: What characteristics affect retention rates? Sustainability, 11(9), 2489.

44 Basu 2020 - Basu, S., O’Neill, J., Sayer, E., Petrie, M., Bellin, R., & Berkowitz, S. A. (2020). Population health impact and cost-effectiveness of community-supported agriculture among low-income U.S. adults: A microsimulation analysis. American Journal of Public Health, 110, 119-126.

45 NIH-Notarianni 2022 - Notarianni, M. & Borst, E. (2022, January). State funding through the Legislature. GusNIP NTAE, Nutrition Incentive Hub (NIH). Accessed December 11, 2025. 

46 KCMO-Urban ag - Kansas City Center for Urban Agriculture. Growing good food in Kansas City neighborhoods: A guide to urban agriculture codes in KCMO.

47 Portland Area-CSA - Portland Area CSA Coalition. CSA resources: Connecting you with your farmer through community supported agriculture.

48 TFP-CSA - The Food Project (TFP). Farm shares & community supported agriculture (CSA).

49 Local Harvest-CSA - LocalHarvest. Community supported agriculture: Find a local CSA.

50 CHFP 2024 - Healthy Food Access Portal. (2024). Profile: Corbin Hill Food Project (CHFP). Accessed December 11, 2025.

51 CHFP-Farm share - Corbin Hill Food Project (CHFP). Farm Share.

52 HarvestShare - HarvestShare. (2025). Brooklyn Grange. Accessed December 11, 2025.

53 Zenger Farm-CSA - Zenger Farm. CSA-Community Supported Agriculture.

54 CBF-CSA - Chesapeake Bay Foundation (CBF). Community Supported Agriculture.

55 PFW-SNAP - Philly Foodworks. SNAP farm share program.

56 White 2018a - White, M. J., Pitts, S. B. J., McGuirt, J. T., Hanson, K. L., Morgan, E. H., Kolodinsky, J., Wang, W., Sitaker, M., Ammerman, A. S., & Seguin, R. A. (2018). The perceived influence of cost-offset community-supported agriculture on food access among low-income families. Public Health Nutrition, 21(15), 2866–2874. 

57 Martinez 2022 - Martinez, C. L., Rosero, D., Thomas, T., & Soto Mas, F. (2022). Community supported agriculture, human capital, and community health. Health Promotion Practice, 23(3), 407-415.

58 Hege 2025 - Hege, A., McCann, M., Walker, D., Edwards, L., McLendon, C., Runkel, S., & McReynolds, R. (2025). North Carolina’s FarmsSHARE: Farmers, food hubs, and community-based organizations sustain healthy food programs. Health Affairs, 44(4), 483-491.

59 Urban-Kuhns 2023 - Kuhns, C., Fiol, O., Fernandez, E., Peiffer, E., & Newman, R. (2023, June 28). How Hmong farmers in the Twin Cities are creating a more equitable food system. Urban Institute.

60 Paul 2019a - Paul, M. (2019). Community-supported agriculture in the United States: Social, ecological, and economic benefits to farming. Journal of Agrarian Change, 19, 162–180.

61 Fremstad 2020 - Fremstad, A., & Paul, M. (2020). Opening the farm gate to women? The gender gap in U.S. agriculture. Journal of Economic Issues, 54(1), 124–141.

62 Hanson 2022 - Hanson, K. L., Xu, L., Marshall, G. A., Sitaker, M., Jilcott Pitts, S. B., Kolodinsky, J., Bennett, A., Carriker, S., Smith, D., Ammerman, A. S., & Seguin-Fowler, R. A. (2022). Participation in cost-offset community-supported agriculture by low-income households in the USA is associated with community characteristics and operational practices. Public Health Nutrition, 25(8), 2277–2287.

63 Hanson 2024 - Hanson, K. L., Concepcion, C., & Volpe, L. C. (2024). Factors associated with participation in community supported agriculture (CSA) among low-income households: A scoping review. Nutrients, 16(15), 2450.

64 Zdenek 2017 - Zdenek RO, Walsh D. Navigating community development: Harnessing comparative advantages to create strategic partnerships. Chapter: The background and history of community development organizations. New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 2017.

65 Kaplan 2007 - Kaplan J, Valls A. Housing discrimination as a basis for Black reparations. Public Affairs Quarterly. 2007;21(3):255-273.

66 Braveman 2022 - Braveman PA, Arkin E, Proctor D, Kauh T, Holm N. Systemic and structural racism: Definitions, examples, health damages, and approaches to dismantling. Health Affairs. 2022;41(2):171-178.

67 Prochnow 2022 - Prochnow T, Valdez D, Curran LS, et al. Multifaceted scoping review of Black/African American transportation and land use expert recommendations on activity-friendly routes to everyday destinations. Health Promotion Practice. 2022.

68 McAndrews 2022 - McAndrews C, Schneider RJ, Yang Y, et al. Toward a gender-inclusive Complete Streets movement. Journal of Planning Literature. 2022;38(1):3-18.

69 Brookings-Semmelroth 2020 - Semmelroth L. How Wilmington, Del. is revitalizing vacant land to rebuild community trust. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution; 2020.

70 Beaulac 2009 - Beaulac J, Kristjansson E, Cummins S. A systematic review of food deserts, 1966-2007. Preventing Chronic Disease. 2009;6(3):A105.

71 Walker 2010b - Walker RE, Keane CR, Burke JG. Disparities and access to healthy food in the United States: A review of food deserts literature. Health and Place. 2010;16(5):876-884.

72 RHIhub-Rural food and hunger - Rural Health Information Hub (RHIhub). Rural hunger and access to healthy food.

73 Peterson 2025 - Peterson, H., Baker, L., Yang, C., Ogelsby, M., Campbell, C., Lindsey, A., & Telg, R. (2025). Hunger games: Food access among food insecure households during COVID-19 in the United States. Medical Research Archives, 13(2).

74 Parot 2024 - Parot, J., Wahlen, S., Schryro, J., & Weckenbrock, P. (2024). Food justice in community supported agriculture – differentiating charitable and emancipatory social support actions. Agriculture and Human Values, 41, 685–699.