School-based suicide risk awareness programs
Evidence Ratings
Scientifically Supported: Strategies with this rating are most likely to make a difference. These strategies have been tested in many robust studies with consistently positive results.
Some Evidence: Strategies with this rating are likely to work, but further research is needed to confirm effects. These strategies have been tested more than once and results trend positive overall.
Expert Opinion: Strategies with this rating are recommended by credible, impartial experts but have limited research documenting effects; further research, often with stronger designs, is needed to confirm effects.
Insufficient Evidence: Strategies with this rating have limited research documenting effects. These strategies need further research, often with stronger designs, to confirm effects.
Mixed Evidence: Strategies with this rating have been tested more than once and results are inconsistent or trend negative; further research is needed to confirm effects.
Evidence of Ineffectiveness: Strategies with this rating are not good investments. These strategies have been tested in many robust studies with consistently negative and sometimes harmful results. Learn more about our methods
Strategies with this rating are likely to work, but further research is needed to confirm effects. These strategies have been tested more than once and results trend positive overall.
Evidence Ratings
Scientifically Supported: Strategies with this rating are most likely to make a difference. These strategies have been tested in many robust studies with consistently positive results.
Some Evidence: Strategies with this rating are likely to work, but further research is needed to confirm effects. These strategies have been tested more than once and results trend positive overall.
Expert Opinion: Strategies with this rating are recommended by credible, impartial experts but have limited research documenting effects; further research, often with stronger designs, is needed to confirm effects.
Insufficient Evidence: Strategies with this rating have limited research documenting effects. These strategies need further research, often with stronger designs, to confirm effects.
Mixed Evidence: Strategies with this rating have been tested more than once and results are inconsistent or trend negative; further research is needed to confirm effects.
Evidence of Ineffectiveness: Strategies with this rating are not good investments. These strategies have been tested in many robust studies with consistently negative and sometimes harmful results. Learn more about our methods
Strategies with this rating are likely to work, but further research is needed to confirm effects. These strategies have been tested more than once and results trend positive overall.
Disparity Ratings
Potential to decrease disparities: Strategies with this rating have the potential to decrease or eliminate disparities between subgroups. Rating is suggested by evidence, expert opinion or strategy design.
Potential for mixed impact on disparities: Strategies with this rating could increase and decrease disparities between subgroups. Rating is suggested by evidence or expert opinion.
Potential to increase disparities: Strategies with this rating have the potential to increase or exacerbate disparities between subgroups. Rating is suggested by evidence, expert opinion or strategy design.
Inconclusive impact on disparities: Strategies with this rating do not have enough evidence to assess potential impact on disparities.
Strategies with this rating do not have enough evidence to assess potential impact on disparities.
Health factors shape the health of individuals and communities. Everything from our education to our environments impacts our health. Modifying these clinical, behavioral, social, economic, and environmental factors can influence how long and how well people live, now and in the future.
School-based suicide risk awareness programs, also known as suicide prevention programs, aim to prevent youth suicide by training school staff to identify signs of suicidality and referring students who are at risk (known as gatekeeper training), screening students for warning signs of suicide, or delivering a curriculum to all students1. Most school-based suicide prevention programs combine one or more of these components and are usually focused on middle or high school settings. Some states require high schools to provide such training to school staff or deliver suicide prevention-related education to students; requirements vary by state.
What could this strategy improve?
Expected Benefits
Our evidence rating is based on the likelihood of achieving these outcomes:
Increased suicide risk awareness
Potential Benefits
Our evidence rating is not based on these outcomes, but these benefits may also be possible:
Increased help-seeking behavior
Reduced suicidal ideation
Reduced suicide
What does the research say about effectiveness?
There is some evidence that school-based suicide risk awareness programs, also known as suicide prevention programs, increase suicide risk awareness among middle and high school students1, 2, 3, 4. More evidence is needed to determine if such programs reduce suicidal ideation, suicide attempts, or increase help-seeking behavior1, 2.
School-based suicide risk awareness programs such as Signs of Suicide, Sources of Strength, and Question, Persuade, Refer (QPR) can increase knowledge of suicide risk factors but have inconsistent effects on help-seeking behavior, suicidal ideation, and suicide attempts1, 2, 3. Such programs are often difficult to study and may not include suicide rates as an outcome4, 5.
Experts suggest that multicomponent prevention programs that combine gatekeeper training, screening, and curricula may be most effective1, 6. Suicide prevention can also include tailored interventions for students experiencing risk factors, known as indicated interventions2.
Suicide screening and education do not appear to increase risk of suicide in adolescents7, 8. Youth suicide is complex and is associated with numerous risk factors, though these may not cause or predict a suicide attempt. Risk factors include mental disorders, previous suicide attempts, certain personality characteristics, family factors, stressful life events, exposure to suicide in media or local communities, and access to lethal means9.
The effectiveness of school-based suicide risk awareness programs to reduce youth suicide likely depends on accessible, affordable, and effective mental health services for students2. Schools that implement screening or gatekeeper training can help coordinate mental health care for students who are identified as being at risk of suicide10. Schools can also consider integrating suicide risk awareness and prevention efforts into existing structures, like multi-tiered systems of support (MTSS)5. Challenges to implementing school-based suicide risk awareness programs can include limited school resources, limited community mental health resources, and difficulty obtaining parental consent for participation2, 11.
Experts recommend that schools carefully consider what outcomes are of interest, as well as their capacity and resources, when determining what type of program to implement1. Experts emphasize gathering data, gaining administrative and stakeholder support, and building infrastructure to support mental health referral and coordination10.
How could this strategy advance health equity? This strategy is rated inconclusive impact on disparities.
It is unclear what impact universal school-based suicide risk awareness programs have on disparities in youth suicide across populations. Suicide rates are significantly higher among youth who are identified as American Indian or Alaska Native, Black, or Hispanic15. Youth who are female, LGBTQ+ youth, and youth who have any same-sex partners are more likely to attempt suicide than their peers16. Suicide rates are also higher among youth who live in rural communities than those who live in urban communities17.
Experts recommend evaluating and shifting structural-level policies, such as public assistance, medical coverage, and law enforcement policy to address disparities in youth suicide rates18. Sovereignty, community autonomy, cultural identification, language, spirituality, healing ways, kinship models, and family connectedness are protective factors against suicide for Native youth19. More research is needed on suicide prevention programs for youth experiencing the most risk factors for suicide2, 5.
What is the relevant historical background?
Suicide is currently the second leading cause of death among youth ages 10 to 24 in the United States20. Suicide rates for this age group increased 52% between 2000 and 2021, though the rate is lower than for other age groups20. More broadly, suicide death rates vary substantially by state. Demographics, firearm availability, mental health status, and access to mental health services may influence suicide rate variation across states21.
Equity Considerations
- Who in your school community experiences risk factors for suicide? How do existing policies at school, such as school discipline or attendance policies, contribute to this risk or discourage help-seeking? How do existing policies in the community, such as law enforcement policies, contribute?
- How can suicide prevention programs in your school connect students to mental health resources at school and in the community? How can school programs support students as they access these services?
Implementation Examples
There are many specific suicide risk awareness programs, particularly at the middle and high school level. The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) provides a toolkit to help high schools and districts around the country implement such programs12. SAMHSA also awards grants in support of state and tribal youth suicide prevention efforts13. The Suicide Prevention Resource Center outlines many approaches to suicide prevention programs, including school curriculums14.
Implementation Resources
‡ Resources with a focus on equity.
SPRC - Suicide Prevention Resource Center (SPRC). Effective suicide prevention requires multiple approaches.
CDC-Suicide prevention - Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Suicide prevention resources for action.
SAMHSA TTAC-Suicide prevention resources - Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), Tribal Training and Technical Assistance Center (TTAC). Suicide prevention resources.
SAMHSA-High school toolkit - Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). Preventing suicide: A toolkit for high schools. HHS Publication No. SMA-12-4669. Rockville, MD: Center for Mental Health Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; 2012.
YSP school guide - Lazear KJ, Roggenbaum S, Blasé K. Youth suicide prevention school-based guide (YSP school guide). Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, College of Behavioral & Community Sciences, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, Department of Child & Family Studies; 2012.
TX-Steps for schools - Poland S, Poland D. Recommendations for Suicide Safer Schools Texas school district action steps. Texas Department of State Health Services, Texas Suicide Prevention Council, & Mental Health America of Texas; 2015.
Footnotes
* Journal subscription may be required for access.
1 Brann 2021 - Brann KL, Baker D, Smith-Millman MK, Watt SJ, DiOrio C. A meta-analysis of suicide prevention programs for school-aged youth. Children and Youth Services Review. 2021;121:105826.
2 Breet 2021 - Breet E, Matooane M, Tomlinson M, Bantjes J. Systematic review and narrative synthesis of suicide prevention in high-schools and universities: A research agenda for evidence-based practice. BMC Public Health. 2021;21(1):1-21.
3 Robinson 2013b - Robinson J, Cox G, Malone A, et al. A systematic review of school-based interventions aimed at preventing, treating, and responding to suicide-related behavior in young people. Crisis. 2013;34(3):164-182.
4 Cusimano 2011 - Cusimano MD, Sameem M. The effectiveness of middle and high school-based suicide prevention programmes for adolescents: A systematic review. Injury Prevention. 2011;17(1):43-49.
5 Singer 2019 - Singer JB, Erbacher TA, Rosen P. School-based suicide prevention: A framework for evidence-based practice. School Mental Health. 2019;11:54-71.
6 Robinson-Link 2020 - Robinson-Link N, Hoover S, Bernstein L, et al. Is gatekeeper training enough for suicide prevention? School Mental Health. 2020;12:239-249.
7 Gould 2005 - Gould MS, Marrocco FA, Kleinman M. Evaluating iatrogenic risk of youth suicide screening programs: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2005;293(13):1635-1643.
8 Bailey 2017 - Bailey E, Spittal MJ, Pirkis J, Gould M, Robinson J. Universal suicide prevention in young people: An evaluation of the safeTALK program in Australian high schools. Crisis. 2017;38(5):300-308.
9 Bilsen 2018 - Bilsen J. Suicide and youth: Risk factors. Frontiers in Psychiatry. 2018;9:1-5.
10 Granello 2018 - Granello PF, Zyromski B. Developing a comprehensive school suicide prevention program. Professional School Counseling. 2018;22(1).
11 Totura 2017 - Totura CMW, Kutash K, Labouliere CD, Karver MS. Evaluating active parental consent procedures for school programming: Addressing the sensitive topic of suicide prevention. Journal of School Health. 2017;87(2):114-120.
12 SAMHSA-High school toolkit - Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). Preventing suicide: A toolkit for high schools. HHS Publication No. SMA-12-4669. Rockville, MD: Center for Mental Health Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; 2012.
13 GLS suicide prevention - Suicide Prevention Resource Center. Garrett Lee Smith (GLS) Suicide Prevention grantees.
14 SPRC - Suicide Prevention Resource Center (SPRC). Effective suicide prevention requires multiple approaches.
15 CDC MMWR-Stone 2023 - Stone DM, Mack KA, Qualters J. Notes from the field: Recent changes in suicide rates, by race and ethnicity and age group — United States, 2021. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR). 2023;72(6):160-162.
16 CDC-YRBS 2023 - Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Youth Behavior Risk Survey: Data summary and trends report, 2011-2021. 2023.
17 Fontanella 2015 - Fontanella CA, Hiance-Steelesmith DL, Phillips GS, et al. Widening rural-urban disparities in youth suicides, United States, 1996-2010. JAMA Pediatrics. 2015;169(5):466-473.
18 Alvarez 2022 - Alvarez K, Polanco-Roman L, Breslow AS, Molock S. Structural racism and suicide prevention for ethnoracially minoritized youth: A conceptual framework and illustration across systems. American Journal of Psychiatry. 2022;179(6):422-433.
19 Zero Suicide - Zero Suicide. Populations: Native American and Alaska Native. Resources for Native American and Alaska Native populations.
20 CDC-Suicide disparities - Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Suicide prevention: Health disparities in suicide.
21 KFF-Saunders 2023 - Saunders H, Panchal N. A look at the latest suicide data and change over the last decade. KFF; 2023.
Related What Works for Health Strategies
To see citations and implementation resources for this strategy, visit:
countyhealthrankings.org/strategies-and-solutions/what-works-for-health/strategies/school-based-suicide-risk-awareness-programs
To see all strategies:
countyhealthrankings.org/whatworks