On-site child care
Evidence Ratings
Scientifically Supported: Strategies with this rating are most likely to make a difference. These strategies have been tested in many robust studies with consistently positive results.
Some Evidence: Strategies with this rating are likely to work, but further research is needed to confirm effects. These strategies have been tested more than once and results trend positive overall.
Expert Opinion: Strategies with this rating are recommended by credible, impartial experts but have limited research documenting effects; further research, often with stronger designs, is needed to confirm effects.
Insufficient Evidence: Strategies with this rating have limited research documenting effects. These strategies need further research, often with stronger designs, to confirm effects.
Mixed Evidence: Strategies with this rating have been tested more than once and results are inconsistent or trend negative; further research is needed to confirm effects.
Evidence of Ineffectiveness: Strategies with this rating are not good investments. These strategies have been tested in many robust studies with consistently negative and sometimes harmful results. Learn more about our methods
Strategies with this rating have limited research documenting effects. These strategies need further research, often with stronger designs, to confirm effects.
Evidence Ratings
Scientifically Supported: Strategies with this rating are most likely to make a difference. These strategies have been tested in many robust studies with consistently positive results.
Some Evidence: Strategies with this rating are likely to work, but further research is needed to confirm effects. These strategies have been tested more than once and results trend positive overall.
Expert Opinion: Strategies with this rating are recommended by credible, impartial experts but have limited research documenting effects; further research, often with stronger designs, is needed to confirm effects.
Insufficient Evidence: Strategies with this rating have limited research documenting effects. These strategies need further research, often with stronger designs, to confirm effects.
Mixed Evidence: Strategies with this rating have been tested more than once and results are inconsistent or trend negative; further research is needed to confirm effects.
Evidence of Ineffectiveness: Strategies with this rating are not good investments. These strategies have been tested in many robust studies with consistently negative and sometimes harmful results. Learn more about our methods
Strategies with this rating have limited research documenting effects. These strategies need further research, often with stronger designs, to confirm effects.
Health factors shape the health of individuals and communities. Everything from our education to our environments impacts our health. Modifying these clinical, behavioral, social, economic, and environmental factors can influence how long and how well people live, now and in the future.
Employers who offer on-site child care provide employees with child care options at work. Care may be provided free of charge, partially subsidized as part of an employee benefit package, or provided at market rates.
What could this strategy improve?
Expected Benefits
Our evidence rating is based on the likelihood of achieving these outcomes:
Increased job satisfaction
Reduced absenteeism
Increased productivity
Potential Benefits
Our evidence rating is not based on these outcomes, but these benefits may also be possible:
Increased breastfeeding rates
What does the research say about effectiveness?
There is insufficient evidence to determine whether on-site child care increases job satisfaction and employee productivity, or decreases employee absenteeism. Available evidence suggests that on-site child care may have positive effects; a study of a hospital-based on-site child care suggests possible reductions in absenteeism1 and a study of on-site child care at research universities suggests possible increases in employee productivity2. A study of internal medicine residency programs suggests that programs that offer on-site child care may have higher board exam pass rates than programs that do not3 and a North Carolina-based study of manufacturing facilities indicates workers place a high value on on-site child care centers, even if they do not have children4. However, early studies of on-site child care find both positive effects and lack of effects, positive or negative, on employee absenteeism, performance, and job satisfaction1, 5, 6, 7, 8. Additional evidence is needed to confirm effects.
On-site child care may also increase breastfeeding duration9. One study at a large public university indicates that on-site child care could have negative effects on employee productivity and satisfaction when it does not provide high quality care and is not paired with organizational support for family life10.
How could this strategy impact health disparities? This strategy is rated no impact on disparities likely.
Implementation Examples
Nationwide, an estimated 7% of companies provide child care at or near worksites, with large companies more likely to offer it than small employers11.
Footnotes
* Journal subscription may be required for access.
1 Gullekson 2014 - Gullekson NL. Vouching for childcare assistance with two quasi-experimental studies. Journal of Managerial Psychology. 2014;29(8):994-1008.
2 Feeney 2014 - Feeney MK, Bernal M, Bowman L. Enabling work? Family-friendly policies and academic productivity for men and women scientists. Science and Public Policy. 2014;41:750-764.
3 Atsawarungruangkit 2015 - Atsawarungruangkit A. Relationship of residency program characteristics with pass rate of the American Board of Internal Medicine certifying exam. Medical Education Online. 2015;20(1):28631.
4 Connelly 2004 - Connelly R, Degraff DS, Willis RA. The value of employer-sponsored child care to employees. Industrial Relations. 2004;43(4):759-792.
5 Goff 1990 - Goff SJ, Mount MK, Jamison R. Employer supported child care, work/family conflict, and absenteeism: A field study. Personnel Psychology. 1990;43(4):793-809.
6 Kossek 1992 - Kossek EE, Nichol V. The effects of on-site child care on employee attitudes and performance. Personnel Psychology. 1992;43(3):485-509.
7 Ezra 1996 - Ezra M, Deckman M. Balancing work and family responsibilities: Flextime and child care in the federal government. Public Administration Review. 1996;56(2):174-179.
8 Barcenas-Frausto 2009 - Barcenas-Frausto J. Family-supportive policies: The employer-sponsored child-care approach as an influence of the relationship between work and family outcomes. The Business Review, Cambridge. 2009;14(1):92-98.
9 Hilliard 2017 - Hilliard ED. A review of worksite lactation accommodations: Occupational health professionals can assure success. Workplace Health & Safety. 2017;65(1):33-44.
10 Ratnasingam 2012 - Ratnasingam P, Spitzmueller C, King WR, et al. Can on-site childcare have detrimental work outcomes? Examining the moderating roles of family supportive organization perceptions and childcare satisfaction. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology. 2012;17(4):435-444.
11 FWI-Matos 2014 - Matos K, Galinsky E. 2014 national study of employers. New York: Families and Work Institute (FWI); 2014.
Related What Works for Health Strategies
To see citations and implementation resources for this strategy, visit:
countyhealthrankings.org/strategies-and-solutions/what-works-for-health/strategies/on-site-child-care
To see all strategies:
countyhealthrankings.org/whatworks