Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) for individuals involved in the justice system
Evidence Ratings
Scientifically Supported: Strategies with this rating are most likely to make a difference. These strategies have been tested in many robust studies with consistently positive results.
Some Evidence: Strategies with this rating are likely to work, but further research is needed to confirm effects. These strategies have been tested more than once and results trend positive overall.
Expert Opinion: Strategies with this rating are recommended by credible, impartial experts but have limited research documenting effects; further research, often with stronger designs, is needed to confirm effects.
Insufficient Evidence: Strategies with this rating have limited research documenting effects. These strategies need further research, often with stronger designs, to confirm effects.
Mixed Evidence: Strategies with this rating have been tested more than once and results are inconsistent or trend negative; further research is needed to confirm effects.
Evidence of Ineffectiveness: Strategies with this rating are not good investments. These strategies have been tested in many robust studies with consistently negative and sometimes harmful results. Learn more about our methods
Strategies with this rating are most likely to make a difference. These strategies have been tested in many robust studies with consistently positive results.
Evidence Ratings
Scientifically Supported: Strategies with this rating are most likely to make a difference. These strategies have been tested in many robust studies with consistently positive results.
Some Evidence: Strategies with this rating are likely to work, but further research is needed to confirm effects. These strategies have been tested more than once and results trend positive overall.
Expert Opinion: Strategies with this rating are recommended by credible, impartial experts but have limited research documenting effects; further research, often with stronger designs, is needed to confirm effects.
Insufficient Evidence: Strategies with this rating have limited research documenting effects. These strategies need further research, often with stronger designs, to confirm effects.
Mixed Evidence: Strategies with this rating have been tested more than once and results are inconsistent or trend negative; further research is needed to confirm effects.
Evidence of Ineffectiveness: Strategies with this rating are not good investments. These strategies have been tested in many robust studies with consistently negative and sometimes harmful results. Learn more about our methods
Strategies with this rating are most likely to make a difference. These strategies have been tested in many robust studies with consistently positive results.
Disparity Ratings
Potential to decrease disparities: Strategies with this rating have the potential to decrease or eliminate disparities between subgroups. Rating is suggested by evidence, expert opinion or strategy design.
Potential for mixed impact on disparities: Strategies with this rating could increase and decrease disparities between subgroups. Rating is suggested by evidence or expert opinion.
Potential to increase disparities: Strategies with this rating have the potential to increase or exacerbate disparities between subgroups. Rating is suggested by evidence, expert opinion or strategy design.
Inconclusive impact on disparities: Strategies with this rating do not have enough evidence to assess potential impact on disparities.
Strategies with this rating do not have enough evidence to assess potential impact on disparities.
Health factors shape the health of individuals and communities. Everything from our education to our environments impacts our health. Modifying these clinical, behavioral, social, economic, and environmental factors can influence how long and how well people live, now and in the future.
Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) helps clients discover and change the thought processes that lead to maladaptive behavior1. CBT programs for individuals involved in the justice system emphasize personal accountability, help participants understand the thoughts and choices that led to their crimes, and teach alternative behaviors and thought processes. Programs can be delivered as individual or group therapy in correctional facilities or in community settings2. Individuals who experience incarceration are sometimes referred to CBT programs through the justice system; some individuals choose to participate voluntarily.
What could this strategy improve?
Expected Benefits
Our evidence rating is based on the likelihood of achieving these outcomes:
Reduced crime
Reduced recidivism
What does the research say about effectiveness?
There is strong evidence that cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) reduces recidivism among youth1, 2, 3, 4 and adults convicted of crimes1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9; effects are strongest for those with a high risk of recidivism2. CBT also reduces recidivism among those with sexual offenses10, 11,12, 13.
CBT can reduce recidivism among those with substance-related offenses5, 14 15, 16, 17. CBT may also reduce recidivism among youth who have sexually offended18. For male youth with violent and chronic offenses, CBT can be particularly effective in reducing the recurrence of serious crimes19. An evaluation of a CBT program designed for women who have offended suggests CBT can reduce rearrests and reconviction when implemented with high fidelity20.
A systematic review that evaluated studies of prison-based CBT found it has no effects on recidivism; experts suggest that prison-based treatment may not be effective to reduce recidivism unless it is linked with continuing support for individuals once they have been released. Individuals who were formerly incarcerated face employment, accommodation, and financial difficulties that are not addressed by mental health treatment alone21.
CBT can improve coping skills for youth in detention institutions22. CBT can also reduce suicidal ideation among those in prison23. A study of justice-involved youth in the community setting suggests that trauma-informed CBT is associated with improved emotional regulation and decreased distress24. Compared to treatment as usual, CBT can also decrease self-reported impaired driving among those who have received a first DUI25. CBT may be less effective for those who have elevated anti-social personality traits26.
The most effective CBT programs usually include anger management and interpersonal skills training. Training staff in CBT, closely monitoring programs, and ensuring program fidelity also result in better outcomes2, 27. CBT may be more effective in reducing recidivism when it is combined with other interventions such as basic skills or vocational training28. CBT for youth who have offended appears to reduce recidivism more when it includes group parenting education, particularly when parents complete the education3. A study of community-based CBT for men who are violent towards their partners indicates that both individual and group therapy are effective at reducing self-reported partner assault, and group therapy is more effective29.
A cost-benefit analysis estimates a $6.31 return for every dollar invested in CBT programs30.
How could this strategy advance health equity? This strategy is rated inconclusive impact on disparities.
It is unclear what impact CBT for individuals involved in the justice system could have on disparities in reincarceration. Black men are most likely to be reincarcerated, even though they may have lower recidivism risk scores than others36, 37. Overall, people who are Black or Hispanic are disproportionately arrested and subsequently convicted and incarcerated, leading to higher rates of incarceration38.
Analysis of Canada-based CBT programs indicates that CBT is effective for offenders with various ethnic backgrounds8. However, a Georgia-based study of the Reasoning and Rehabilitation (R&R) program indicates that R&R is less effective in reducing recidivism for non-white participants than for white participants39. The follow-up study suggests that facilitator gender, number of facilitators, and class size have differential impacts for Black men when compared to white men. Black men may have lower recidivism rates when they participate in programs with female facilitators and follow recommended guidelines of two facilitators for every four to eight participants40. Higher rates of recidivism are linked with living in resource-poor neighborhoods37, 41.
What is the relevant historical background?
Stories about crime or dangerous activity have repeated throughout U.S. history and have been used to justify the incarceration of certain groups of people. After the Civil War, the 13th Amendment outlawed slavery except as punishment for a crime42. This led to the passage of Black codes, or laws designed to limit the freedom of Black Americans and create a supply of prison labor43. In 1918, Congress passed the Chamberlain-Kahn Act, which allowed the government to arrest any woman suspected of prostitution and incarcerate women who tested positive for sexually transmitted infections44. During World War II the U.S. government imprisoned about 120,000 Japanese Americans in internment camps, most of whom were U.S. citizens45.
In 1965, Congress’s Law Enforcement Assistance Act marked the beginning of federal government involvement in criminal justice and law enforcement and the Johnson Administration declared a “war on crime” a year later38. Between 1970 and 2000, U.S. incarceration increased by 400 percent and 1,553,574 individuals were imprisoned in 200946. This was driven by increasingly harsh and punitive sentencing laws alongside aggressive policing such as during the Nixon Administration’s “war on drugs”38. Politicians used racially coded language to link crime with minority communities and Black Americans in particular38. Today the prison industry, including private prisons and other companies that benefit from large prison populations, spends substantial resources lobbying for punitive laws and fewer regulations of prison labor38. Mass incarceration today disproportionately harms Black people, other people of color, and those living in poverty47.
Equity Considerations
- Who in your community has been involved in the justice system?
- What resources and partnerships are needed to provide CBT for individuals who are or were formerly involved in the justice system?
- What barriers do individuals involved in the justice system face to living a healthy life? What supports besides CBT do they need?
Implementation Examples
There are some cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) programs widely used in the U.S. criminal justice system, such as Aggression Replacement Training31, Criminal Conduct and Substance Abuse Treatment-Strategies for Self-Improvement and Change (SSC), Moral Reconation Therapy32, Reasoning and Rehabilitation33, and Thinking for a Change3435.
Implementation Resources
‡ Resources with a focus on equity.
NIC-CBT - National Institute of Corrections (NIC). Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). U.S. Department of Justice.
Addictions-CBT - Addictions.com. Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT).
Footnotes
* Journal subscription may be required for access.
1 Wilson 2005 - Wilson DB, Bouffard LA, Mackenzie DL. A quantitative review of structured, group-oriented, cognitive-behavioral programs for offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior. 2005;32(2):172-204.
2 Campbell-Lipsey 2007 - Lipsey MW, Landenberger NA, Wilson SJ. Effects of cognitive-behavioral programs for criminal offenders. Campbell Systematic Reviews. 2007:6.
3 Jeong 2017 - Jeong S, Fenoff R, Martin JH. Evaluating the effectiveness of an evidence-based cognitive restructuring approach: 1-year results from Project ASPECT. International Journal of Cognitive Therapy. 2017;10(1):1-16.
4 Jewell 2015 - Jewell JD, Malone MD, Rose P, Sturgeon D, Owens S. A multiyear follow-up study examining the effectiveness of a cognitive behavioral group therapy program on the recidivism of juveniles on probation. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology. 2015;59(3):259-272.
5 Han 2023a - Han, S., Hyatt, J. M., Barnes, G. C., & Sherman, L. W. (2023). A Bayesian analysis of a cognitive-behavioral therapy intervention for high-risk people on probation. Evaluation Review, 48(6), 991–1023.
6 Ferguson 2013 - Ferguson LM, Wormith JS. A meta-analysis of moral reconation therapy. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology. 2013;57(9):1076-1106.
7 Barnes 2017 - Barnes GC, Hyatt JM, Sherman LW. Even a little bit helps: An implementation and experimental evaluation of cognitive-behavioral therapy for high-risk probationers. Criminal Justice and Behavior. 2017;44(4):611-630.
8 Usher 2014 - Usher AM, Stewart LA. Effectiveness of correctional programs with ethnically diverse offenders: A meta-analytic study. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology. 2014;58(2):209-230.
9 Feucht 2016 - Feucht T, Holt T. Does cognitive behavioral therapy work in criminal justice? A new analysis from CrimeSolutions.gov. NIJ Journal. 2016;(277):10-17.
10 Rocha 2023 - Rocha, I. C. O., & Valença, A. M. (2023). The efficacy of CBT based interventions to sexual offenders: A systematic review of the last decade literature. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 87, 101856.
11 Harrison 2020 - Harrison, J. L., O’Toole, S. K., Ammen, S., Ahlmeyer, S., Harrell, S. N., & Hernandez, J. L. (2020). Sexual offender treatment effectiveness within cognitive-behavioral programs: A meta-analytic investigation of general, sexual, and violent recidivism. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 27(1), 1–25.
12 Campbell-Schmucker 2017 - Schmucker M, Lösel F. Sexual offender treatment for reducing recidivism among convicted sex offenders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Campbell Systematic Reviews. 2017:8.
13 Grady 2017 - Grady MD, Edwards D, Pettus-Davis C. A longitudinal outcome evaluation of a prison-based sex offender treatment program. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment. 2017;29(3):239-266.
14 Easton 2018 - Easton, C. J., Crane, C. A., & Mandel, D. (2018). A randomized controlled trial assessing the efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy for substance‐dependent domestic violence offenders: An integrated substance abuse‐domestic violence treatment approach (SADV). Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 44(3), 483–498.
15 McMurran 2007 - McMurran M. What works in substance misuse treatments for offenders? Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health. 2007;17(4):225-233.
16 Quinn 2015 - Quinn TP, Quinn EL. The effect of cognitive-behavioral therapy on driving while intoxicated recidivism. Journal of Drug Issues. 2015;45(4):431-446.
17 Needham 2015 - Needham M, Gummerum M, Mandeville-Norden R, et al. Association between three different cognitive behavioral alcohol treatment programs and recidivism rates among male offenders: Findings from the United Kingdom. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research. 2015;39(6):1100-1107.
18 Carpentier 2021 - Carpentier, J., & Proulx, J. (2021). Recidivism rates of treated non-treated and dropout adolescent who have sexually offended: A non-randomized study. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 757242.
19 Campbell-Garrido 2007 - Garrido V, Morales LA. Serious (violent or chronic) juvenile offenders: A systematic review of treatment effectiveness in secure corrections. Campbell Systematic Reviews. 2007:7.
20 Duwe 2015 - Duwe G, Clark V. Importance of program integrity: Outcome evaluation of a gender-responsive, cognitive-behavioral program for female offenders. Criminology & Public Policy. 2015;14(2):301-328.
21 Beaudry 2021 - Beaudry, G., Yu, R., Perry, A. E., & Fazel, S. (2021). Effectiveness of psychological interventions in prison to reduce recidivism: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. The Lancet Psychiatry, 8(9), 759–773.
22 Ratnam 2021 - Ratnam, K. K. Y., Nordin, A., Tok, P. S. K., Farid, N. D. N., & Dahlui, M. (2021). Mental health interventions in Juvenile detention institutions: A systematic review of what works. Adolescent Psychiatry, 11(4), 203–224
23 Pedrola-Pons 2024 - Pedrola-Pons, A., Sanchez-Carro, Y., Pemau, A., Garcia-Ramos, A., & De La Torre-Luque, A. (2024). Efficiency of psychological interventions in the prevention of suicidal behavior and self-injury in penitentiary population: A systematic review. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 92, 101948.
24 Dumornay 2022a - Dumornay, N. M., Finegold, K. E., Chablani, A., Elkins, L., Krouch, S., Baldwin, M., Youn, S. J., Marques, L., Ressler, K. J., & Moreland-Capuia, A. (2022). Improved emotion regulation following a trauma-informed CBT-based intervention associates with reduced risk for recidivism in justice-involved emerging adults. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 13, 951429.
25 Osilla 2019 - Osilla, K. C., Paddock, S. M., McCullough, C. M., Jonsson, L., & Watkins, K. E. (2019). Randomized clinical trial examining cognitive behavioral therapy for individuals with a first‐time DUI offense. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 43(10), 2222–2231.
26 Lester 2024 - Lester, M., Scanlon, F., & Batastini, A. (2024). Doubling down on dosage: Exploring the interplay between dosage effects, antisocial traits, treatment attitudes, and recidivism-related therapy outcomes. Journal of Criminal Psychology.
27 Gannon 2019 - Gannon, T. A., Olver, M. E., Mallion, J. S., & James, M. (2019). Does specialized psychological treatment for offending reduce recidivism? A meta-analysis examining staff and program variables as predictors of treatment effectiveness. Clinical Psychology Review, 73, 101752.
28 Hsieh 2022 - Hsieh, M.-L., Chen, K.-J., Choi, P.-S., & Hamilton, Z. K. (2022). Treatment combinations: The joint effects of multiple evidence-based interventions on recidivism reduction. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 49(6), 911–929.
29 Murphy 2020a - Murphy, C. M., Eckhardt, C. I., Clifford, J. M., LaMotte, A. D., & Meis, L. A. (2020). Individual versus group cognitive-behavioral therapy for partner-violent men: A preliminary randomized trial. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 35(15–16), 2846–2868.
30 WSIPP-CBT 2023 - Washington State Institute for Public Policy (WSIPP). (2023). Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) (for individuals classified as high- or moderate risk).
31 EPISCenter-ART - Evidence-based Prevention & Intervention Support Center (EPISCenter). Aggression Replacement Training (ART). Pennsylvania Commission on Crime and Delinquency, Penn State University Prevention Research Center.
32 MRT - Moral Reconation Therapy (MRT). MRT changes minds.
33 R&R - Ross RR, Fabiano E, Ross RD. The reasoning & rehabilitation (R&R) program. Ottawa, CAN: Cognitive Centre of Canada.
34 NIC-T4C - National Institute of Corrections (NIC). Thinking for a Change (T4C). U.S. Department of Justice.
35 US DOJ-CBT - Thigpen ML, Keiser GM. Cognitive-behavioral treatment (CBT): A review and discussion for corrections professionals. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice (U.S. DOJ), National Institute of Corrections (NIC); 2007.
36 Ropes Berry 2020 - Ropes Berry, K., Kennedy, S. C., Lloyd, M., Veeh, C. A., & Tripodi, S. J. (2020). The intersectional effects of race and gender on time to reincarceration. Justice Quarterly, 37(1), 132–160.
37 Mears 2008 - Mears, D. P., Wang, X., Hay, C., & Bales, W. D. (2008). Social ecology and recidivism: Implications for prisoner reentry. Criminology, 46(2), 301–340.
38 NASEM 2014 - National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM), National Research Council. (2014). The growth of incarceration in the United States: Exploring causes and consequences. The National Academies Press.
39 Van Voorhis 2013 - Van Voorhis, P., Spiropoulos, G., Ritchie, P. N., Seabrook, R., & Spruance, L. (2013). Identifying areas of specific responsivity in cognitive–behavioral treatment outcomes. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 40(11), 1250–1279.
40 Spiropoulos 2018 - Spiropoulos, G. V., Van Voorhis, P., & Salisbury, E. J. (2018). Programmatic moderators of CBT correctional treatment for whites and African Americans. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 62(8), 2236–2258.
41 Kubrin 2006 - Kubrin, C. E., & Stewart, E. A. (2006). Predicting who reoffends: The neglected role of neighborhood context in recidivism studies. Criminology, 44(1), 165–197.
42 US Const. XIII - U.S. Const. amend. XIII.
43 History-Black codes - History.com. (2023, March 29). Black codes.
44 History-Stern 2019 - Stern, S.W. (2019, July 21). America’s forgotten mass imprisonment of women believed to be sexually immoral. History.com.
45 History-Japanese internment - History.com. (2024, April 17). Japanese internment camps.
46 Vera-Mass incarceration causes - Vera Institute of Justice. Causes of mass incarceration. Retrieved October 22, 2024.
47 Vera-Mass incarceration statistics - Vera Institute of Justice. Incarceration statistics. Retrieved October 22, 2024.
Related What Works for Health Strategies
To see citations and implementation resources for this strategy, visit:
countyhealthrankings.org/strategies-and-solutions/what-works-for-health/strategies/cognitive-behavioral-therapy-cbt-for-individuals-involved-in-the-justice-system
To see all strategies:
countyhealthrankings.org/whatworks