Out of town bypasses
Evidence Ratings
Scientifically Supported: Strategies with this rating are most likely to make a difference. These strategies have been tested in many robust studies with consistently positive results.
Some Evidence: Strategies with this rating are likely to work, but further research is needed to confirm effects. These strategies have been tested more than once and results trend positive overall.
Expert Opinion: Strategies with this rating are recommended by credible, impartial experts but have limited research documenting effects; further research, often with stronger designs, is needed to confirm effects.
Insufficient Evidence: Strategies with this rating have limited research documenting effects. These strategies need further research, often with stronger designs, to confirm effects.
Mixed Evidence: Strategies with this rating have been tested more than once and results are inconsistent or trend negative; further research is needed to confirm effects.
Evidence of Ineffectiveness: Strategies with this rating are not good investments. These strategies have been tested in many robust studies with consistently negative and sometimes harmful results. Learn more about our methods
Strategies with this rating are likely to work, but further research is needed to confirm effects. These strategies have been tested more than once and results trend positive overall.
Evidence Ratings
Scientifically Supported: Strategies with this rating are most likely to make a difference. These strategies have been tested in many robust studies with consistently positive results.
Some Evidence: Strategies with this rating are likely to work, but further research is needed to confirm effects. These strategies have been tested more than once and results trend positive overall.
Expert Opinion: Strategies with this rating are recommended by credible, impartial experts but have limited research documenting effects; further research, often with stronger designs, is needed to confirm effects.
Insufficient Evidence: Strategies with this rating have limited research documenting effects. These strategies need further research, often with stronger designs, to confirm effects.
Mixed Evidence: Strategies with this rating have been tested more than once and results are inconsistent or trend negative; further research is needed to confirm effects.
Evidence of Ineffectiveness: Strategies with this rating are not good investments. These strategies have been tested in many robust studies with consistently negative and sometimes harmful results. Learn more about our methods
Strategies with this rating are likely to work, but further research is needed to confirm effects. These strategies have been tested more than once and results trend positive overall.
Health factors shape the health of individuals and communities. Everything from our education to our environments impacts our health. Modifying these clinical, behavioral, social, economic, and environmental factors can influence how long and how well people live, now and in the future.
Out of town bypasses are roads that avoid built-up areas such as towns, cities, or commercial/business districts. Typically designed for higher speed limits, bypasses are intended to allow travelers, including trucks, to continue at highway speeds and reduce through traffic congestion within towns and cities. Bypasses may incorporate more than one town, looping around rural communities1.
What could this strategy improve?
Expected Benefits
Our evidence rating is based on the likelihood of achieving these outcomes:
Reduced injuries
Increased pedestrian and cyclist safety
Potential Benefits
Our evidence rating is not based on these outcomes, but these benefits may also be possible:
Improved quality of life
Improved sense of community
Reduced emissions
What does the research say about effectiveness?
There is some evidence that out of town bypasses decrease traffic injuries and increase pedestrian and cyclist safety1, 2, 3, 4. Additional evidence is needed to confirm effects.
Out of town bypasses have been shown to decrease traffic injuries on both main roads through town and on bypass roads1, 3, 4. Out of town bypasses appear to reduce truck traffic on main roads through town5, 6. A New Zealand-based study suggests out of town bypasses may also increase cycling and cyclist safety when cycleways or bike paths are included6. Bypasses can reduce social disturbances such as noise levels7, 8, support community cohesion, and improve overall quality of life in towns8, and reduce particulate matter pollutants near the bypassed road9.
Bypasses are often located in less populated areas, since changing traffic flow may increase air pollution4 and noise levels, and decrease community cohesion near the bypass2, 4. In some instances, out of town bypasses may shift crash locations, modestly reducing effects on overall crash rates10.
Experts suggest that bypass routes can be effectively incorporated into previously established networks by transit planners7.
How could this strategy impact health disparities? This strategy is rated no impact on disparities likely.
Implementation Examples
Bypass roads are found in urban, rural, and suburban areas throughout the U.S., although design and operational practices vary11.
Implementation Resources
CUTR-Bypass - Center for Urban Transportation Research (CUTR). What to expect when you’re expecting a bypass: Webinar and bypass basics brochure. Tampa, FL: Center for Urban Transportation Research (CUTR), University of South Florida (USF); 2014.
Footnotes
* Journal subscription may be required for access.
1 Cena 2011 - Cena LG, Keren N, Li W, et al. A Bayesian assessment of the effect of highway bypasses in Iowa on crashes and crash rate. Journal of Safety Research. 2011;42(4):241–52.
2 Egan 2003 - Egan M, Petticrew M, Ogilvie D, Hamilton V. New roads and human health: A systematic review. American Journal of Public Health. 2003;93(9):1463-71.
3 Elvik 2001 - Elvik R, Amundsen FH, Hofset F. Road safety effects of bypasses. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 2001;1758(01):13–20.
4 Thomson 2008 - Thomson H, Jepson R, Hurley F, Douglas M. Assessing the unintended health impacts of road transport policies and interventions: Translating research evidence for use in policy and practice. BMC Public Health. 2008;8:339.
5 Mills 2011 - Mills J, Fricker J. Integrated analysis of economic impacts of bypasses on communities: Panel data analysis and case study interviews. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 2011;2242:114-121.
6 Orr 2012 - Orr J. The Ruby Bay bypass – The project that pushed the boundaries. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Municipal Engineer. 2012;165(4):215-218.
7 Gaffney 2017 - Gaffney JL, Bunker JM, Dawes LA. An investigation into the need for highway bypass development. Australasian Transport Research Forum; 2017.
8 Ramis 2003 - Ramis J, Alba J, Garcia D, Herna F. Noise effects of reducing traffic flow through a Spanish city. Applied Acoustics. 2003;64(3):343-64.
9 Burr 2004 - Burr ML, Karani G, Davies B, Holmes BA, Williams KL. Effects on respiratory health of a reduction in air pollution from vehicle exhaust emissions. Occupational & Environmental Medicine. 2004;61(3):212-8.
10 Elias 2011 - Elias W, Shiftan Y. The safety impact of land use changes resulting from bypass road constructions. Journal of Transport Geography. 2011;19(6):1120–9.
11 US DOT-FHWA - U.S. Department of Transportation (U.S. DOT). Federal Highway Administration (FHWA).
Related What Works for Health Strategies
To see citations and implementation resources for this strategy, visit:
countyhealthrankings.org/strategies-and-solutions/what-works-for-health/strategies/out-of-town-bypasses
To see all strategies:
countyhealthrankings.org/whatworks