Building Civic Health through Healthy Democracies
There is a growing recognition that voting and other forms of civic engagement are connected to population health and health disparities. Yet the connections between civic engagement, community and policy conditions, and population health outcomes have not been well established. Over the past several years, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation has been funding projects that aim to improve the research and understanding behind this connection. The Center for Social Innovation in partnership with the University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute has been a part of this work.
In June 2021, we released the Civic Engagement and Population Health Compendium, which articulates concepts and measures relevant to civic engagement that extend beyond voter registration and voter turnout. Voting is critical, but influencing policy also includes activities such as contacting officials, making campaign contributions and attending public hearings. Policies are shaped by elections and by those who continue to engage in the process afterward. Past scholarship has shown that communities with greater resources and fewer barriers to civic engagement are more likely to have their needs addressed.
Inequities in civic engagement are especially significant given new voting restrictions proposed and passed in the wake of the 2020 election, amidst unsubstantiated voter fraud claims. As of July 2021, the Brennan Center for Justice reported that 18 states, the majority of which are in the Midwest or South, have enacted laws this year making it harder to vote. The new laws include narrowing the window to apply for mail-in-ballots and cutting the number of polling places. At the same time, the Brennan Center also identified 25 states ranging from California to Maryland, that passed laws with provisions that expand voting access.
In addition to knowing the barriers to civic engagement, it is also important to understand inequities in participation by race, gender, socioeconomic status, and immigrant status. We must prioritize research that helps us understand the causal mechanisms underlying the links between health and civic engagement, and interventions that can reduce barriers regardless of our identities or lived experiences.
These mechanisms are likely to be complex and will require different methods and approaches to improve our understanding of factors that jointly produce disparities. This kind of research is improved when communities and organizations most impacted by inequities are empowered as active partners in the design, implementation, analysis, and dissemination of findings.
Action-oriented research that gets at key indicators, underlying mechanisms, and pragmatic solutions is more important than ever in maintaining a healthy democracy.
The Civic Engagement and Population Health Compendium is a concise collection of research and materials on civic engagement and population health including: key concepts, indicators, and datasets related to civic engagement, broadly and comprehensively defined, and measured at the individual and group level, and across varied geographic scales.
The compendium, available at https://socialinnovation.ucr.edu/, was written as part of Civic Engagement and Population Health Initiative, a joint project of the University of California, Riverside and the University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute.
Support for this program was provided by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Foundation.