2011 | Ziebach, South Dakota | Diabetic screening
Summary Information
| Range in South Dakota (Min-Max): |
68-95% |
| Overall in South Dakota: | 83% |
| National Benchmark: | 89% (90th percentile) |
Ranking Methodology
| Summary Measure: | Health Factors - Clinical Care (Quality of Care) |
| Weight in Health Factors: | 2.5% |
| Years of Data Used: | 2006-2007 |
| Map ↓ |
|---|
| The counties are shaded with lighter counties having a better rank. Gray counties are not reported (NR). |
Flash Player 8 (or above), is required to view and use maps.
|
Diabetic screening is calculated as the percent of diabetic Medicare patients whose blood sugar control was screened in the past year using a test of their glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels.
Estimates of diabetic screening were calculated by the authors of the Dartmouth Atlas of Health Care using Medicare claims data.
Regular HbA1c screening among diabetic patients is considered the standard of care. It helps assess the management of diabetes over the long term by providing an estimate of how well a patient has managed his or her diabetes over the past two to three months. When hyperglycemia is addressed and controlled, complications from diabetes can be delayed or prevented.
Scroll down for details on this measure for all of the counties in this state.
| Table ↓ | |
|---|---|
| No of Diabetics | No of Diabetec Medicare enrollees, 2006-2007 |
| % HbA1c | Percent of Diabetic Medicare enrollees receiving HbA1c test |
| Error Margin | 95% confidence interval reported by Dartmouth Institute |
| Z-Score | (Measure - Average of SD counties)/(Standard Deviation) |
| Place | No of Diabetics | % HbA1c | Error Margin | Z-Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aurora | 20 | 70% | 33-100 | 2.25 |
| Beadle | 69 | 86% | 64-100 | -0.05 |
| Bennett | 0.00 | |||
| Bon Homme | 40 | 88% | 59-100 | -0.34 |
| Brookings | 73 | 79% | 59-100 | 0.85 |
| Brown | 188 | 90% | 76-100 | -0.70 |
| Brule | 36 | 94% | 63-100 | -1.37 |
| Buffalo | 0.00 | |||
| Butte | 23 | 78% | 42-100 | 1.02 |
| Campbell | NR | |||
| Charles Mix | 59 | 92% | 67-100 | -0.94 |
| Clark | 17 | 88% | 44-100 | -0.45 |
| Clay | 0.00 | |||
| Codington | 121 | 92% | 75-100 | -0.97 |
| Corson | 0.00 | |||
| Custer | 47 | 89% | 62-100 | -0.62 |
| Davison | 74 | 85% | 64-100 | 0.01 |
| Day | 34 | 79% | 49-100 | 0.85 |
| Deuel | 15 | 93% | 44-100 | -1.20 |
| Dewey | 0.00 | |||
| Douglas | 19 | 84% | 43-100 | 0.14 |
| Edmunds | 23 | 91% | 52-100 | -0.90 |
| Fall River | 38 | 87% | 57-100 | -0.24 |
| Faulk | NR | |||
| Grant | 61 | 85% | 62-100 | -0.01 |
| Gregory | 33 | 91% | 58-100 | -0.85 |
| Haakon | 13 | 92% | 40-100 | NR |
| Hamlin | 41 | 93% | 63-100 | -1.11 |
| Hand | 36 | 97% | 65-100 | NR |
| Hanson | 39 | 90% | 60-100 | -0.67 |
| Harding | NR | |||
| Hughes | 75 | 85% | 64-100 | -0.02 |
| Hutchinson | 30 | 87% | 53-100 | -0.22 |
| Hyde | 13 | 85% | 35-100 | NR |
| Jackson | 0.00 | |||
| Jerauld | 13 | 85% | 35-100 | 0.09 |
| Jones | NR | |||
| Kingsbury | 29 | 79% | 47-100 | 0.87 |
| Lake | 55 | 85% | 61-100 | -0.04 |
| Lawrence | 116 | 78% | 62-95 | 1.00 |
| Lincoln | 93 | 91% | 72-100 | -0.92 |
| Lyman | 20 | 70% | 33-100 | 2.25 |
| Marshall | 26 | 85% | 49-100 | 0.09 |
| McCook | 23 | 87% | 49-100 | -0.26 |
| McPherson | 21 | 90% | 50-100 | -0.78 |
| Meade | 77 | 78% | 58-98 | 1.07 |
| Mellette | 0.00 | |||
| Miner | 20 | 95% | 52-100 | -1.45 |
| Minnehaha | 495 | 84% | 76-92 | 0.20 |
| Moody | 25 | 68% | 36-100 | 2.54 |
| Pennington | 380 | 83% | 74-92 | 0.34 |
| Perkins | 19 | 74% | 35-100 | 1.70 |
| Potter | 0.00 | |||
| Roberts | 54 | 80% | 56-100 | 0.82 |
| Sanborn | 13 | 100% | 46-100 | NR |
| Shannon | 0.00 | |||
| Spink | 29 | 93% | 58-100 | -1.17 |
| Stanley | 13 | 92% | 40-100 | NR |
| Sully | 18 | 78% | 37-100 | NR |
| Todd | 0.00 | |||
| Tripp | 26 | 92% | 55-100 | -1.05 |
| Turner | 34 | 85% | 54-100 | -0.02 |
| Union | 73 | 88% | 66-100 | -0.37 |
| Walworth | 50 | 76% | 52-100 | 1.36 |
| Yankton | 82 | 90% | 70-100 | -0.75 |
| Ziebach | NR |
NR in Z-Score column indicates county "not ranked"
