County Health Rankings & Roadmaps, A Healthier Nation, County by County

The County Health Rankings models and measures

Our Approach

The County Health Rankings model of population health

What can I do?

Action Center

Explore guides and tools for improving health.

What Works for Health

Explore programs and policies that work!

What can I learn from others?

Reports

Key findings from the last four years of County Health Rankings and other national reports.

County-by-County Blog

Project updates, commentaries, events and news about health across the nation from the County Health Rankings & Roadmaps team.

Family treatment drug courts

Evidence Rating

Scientifically Supported

Decision Makers

Family treatment drug courts (FTDCs) work with parents involved in the child welfare system who may lose custody of their children due to substance abuse. FTDCs include intensive judicial monitoring, substance abuse treatment, frequent drug testing, comprehensive wrap-around services, and rewards and sanctions linked to program compliance. Eligible families are referred to FTDCs by a parent’s attorney, a social worker, a FTDC administrator, or a family court judge; program participation is voluntary (, Gifford 2014). FTDCs address both child safety issues and parental substance abuse treatment ().

Expected Beneficial Outcomes (Rated)

  • Increased family reunification

  • Increased substance use disorder treatment

Other Potential Beneficial Outcomes

  • Improved family functioning

Evidence of Effectiveness

There is strong evidence that family treatment drug courts (FTDCs) increase the likelihood that children will safely reunite with their parent(s) and reduce the time children spend in foster care (, Marlowe 2012, ). Parents who participate in FTDCs are more likely to enter and complete substance abuse treatment than parents who receive usual care (Marlowe 2012, , , ).

Parents who participate in FTDCs receive more treatment than parents who receive usual care (, , , ). FTDCs may also improve family functioning (, ) and decrease children’s re-entry to foster care (). Parents who complete FTDC programs are more likely to reunite with their children than parents who do not participate or participate but do not complete the program (Gifford 2014). Enhancing FTDCs with intensive, individualized multi-dimensional family therapy and strategies to increase family engagement and retention, such as peer mentoring and support groups, may further increase the likelihood of reunification (Drabble 2016, , , ).

In some circumstances, children whose parents are participating in FTDCs are not placed in their permanent homes as quickly as children whose parents are in usual care, perhaps because FTDCs allow parents more time to achieve sobriety than the traditional justice system (, ). In other circumstances, children whose parents are participating in FTDCs move more quickly toward permanency than children whose parents are not (, ).

In a Baltimore-based study, a FTDC yielded $5,500 of savings per family by reducing foster care use and increasing family reunification (Burrus 2011).

Impact on Disparities

No impact on disparities likely

Implementation Examples

In 2015, there are more than 300 family treatment drug courts operating in the United States (OJJDP-FDC guidelines).

Implementation Resources

NCSACW-FTDCs - National Center on Substance Abuse and Child Welfare (NCSACW). Family treatment drug courts (FTDCs).

Citations - Evidence

* Journal subscription may be required for access.

Green 2007* - Green BL, Furrer C, Worcel S, Burrus S, Finigan MW. How effective are family treatment drug courts? Outcomes from a four-site national study. Child Maltreatment. 2007;12(1):43-59.

Worcel 2008* - Worcel SD, Furrer CJ, Green BL, Burrus SWM, Finigan MW. Effects of family treatment drug courts on substance abuse and child welfare outcomes. Child Abuse Review. 2008;17(6):427-43.

Bruns 2012* - Bruns EJ, Pullman MD, Weathers ES, Wirschem ML, Murphy JK. Effects of a multidisciplinary family treatment drug court on child and family outcomes: Results of a quasi-experimental study. Child Maltreatment. 2012;17(3):218-30.

Chuang 2012* - Chuang E, Moore K, Barrett B, Young MS. Effect of an integrated family dependency treatment court on child welfare reunification, time to permanency and re-entry rates. Children and Youth Services Review. 2012;34(9):1896-1902.

Burrus 2011 - Burrus SWM, Mackin JR, Finigan MW. Show me the money: Child welfare cost savings of a family drug court. Juvenile and Family Court Journal. 2011;62(3):1-14.

Oliveros 2011* - Oliveros A, Kaufman J. Addressing substance abuse treatment needs of parents involved with the child welfare system. Child Welfare. 2011;90(1):25–41.

Gifford 2014 - Gifford EJ, Eldred LM, Vernerey A, Sloan FA. How does family drug treatment court participation affect child welfare outcomes? Child Abuse & Neglect. 2014;38(10):1659-1670.

Lloyd 2015* - Lloyd MH. Family drug courts: Conceptual frameworks, empirical evidence, and implications for social work. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services. 2015;96(1):49-57.

Marlowe 2012 - Marlowe DB, Carey SM. Research update on Family Drug Courts. Need to Know. Alexandria, VA: National Association of Drug Court Professionals (NADCP); 2012.

van Wormer 2016* - van Wormer J, Hsieh ML. Healing families: Outcomes from a family treatment drug court. Juvenile & Family Court Journal. 2016;67(2):49-65.

Rodi 2015* - Rodi MS, Killian CM, Breitenbucher P, et al. New approaches for working with children and families involved in family treatment drug courts: Findings from the Children Affected by Methamphetamine Program. Child Welfare. 2015;94(4):205-232.

Cosden 2015* - Cosden M, Koch LM. Changes in adult, child, and family functioning among participants in a family treatment drug court. Child Welfare. 2015;94(5):89-106.

Drabble 2016 - Drabble LA, Haun LL, Kushins H, Cohen E. Measuring client satisfaction and engagement: The role of a mentor parent program in family drug treatment court. Juvenile & Family Court Journal. 2016;67(1):19-32.

Child 2015* - Child H, McIntyre D. Examining the relationships between family drug court program compliance and child welfare outcomes. Child Welfare. 2015;94(5):67-87.

Citations - Implementation Examples

* Journal subscription may be required for access.

OJJDP-FDC guidelines - Children and Families Futures. Guidance to States: Recommendations for developing family drug court (FDC) guidelines. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP), Office of Justice Programs; 2015.

Date Last Updated

Oct 14, 2016