County Health Rankings & Roadmaps, A Healthier Nation, County by County

The County Health Rankings models and measures

Our Approach

The County Health Rankings model of population health

What can I do?

Action Center

Explore guides and tools for improving health.

What Works for Health

Explore programs and policies that work!

What can I learn from others?

Reports

Key findings from the last four years of County Health Rankings and other national reports.

County-by-County Blog

Project updates, commentaries, events and news about health across the nation from the County Health Rankings & Roadmaps team.

Cure Violence Health model

Cure Violence Health model, formerly Chicago CeaseFire, uses a public health approach to prevent violence. Cure Violence includes efforts to detect and intervene in potentially violent situations, educate and mobilize communities against violence, and connect high-risk individuals to social services. Outreach workers develop relationships with high-risk individuals and promote community norms to reject the use of violence. Violence interrupters, in some cases former gang members, identify and directly mediate potentially dangerous conflicts. Cure Violence health model works with law enforcement to select intervention areas, refer high-risk individuals to social services, and organize community events (Cure Violence, RWJF-Feiden 2014).

Expected Beneficial Outcomes (Rated)

  • Reduced gun violence

Other Potential Beneficial Outcomes

  • Reduced homicide

Evidence of Effectiveness

There is some evidence that the Cure Violence Health model, formerly called Chicago CeaseFire, reduces gun violence in high crime urban areas when the model is implemented with fidelity (Skogan 2008, CCI-Picard-Fritsche 2013, JHSPH-Webster 2012). However, additional evidence is needed to confirm effects.

Reductions in gun violence followed implementation of Cure Violence initiatives in five of seven participating Chicago neighborhoods and one Brooklyn neighborhood (Skogan 2008, CCI-Picard-Fritsche 2013). Chicago-based efforts also reduced shooting density in specified crime hot spots and may have contributed to decreases in firearm homicides (Skogan 2008). Non-fatal shootings appeared to decrease in participating Baltimore neighborhoods (JHSPH-Webster 2012).

An evaluation of efforts in Baltimore’s Park Heights neighborhood suggests Cure Violence may also improve attitudes toward violence among high-risk male youth ().

Researchers suggest that a violence interrupter’s skills in conflict mediation and knowledge of gang conflict and violence, credibility with a community, and comprehensive community embeddedness are particularly important to successful implementation (, ). Efforts to ensure implementation fidelity and quality are essential to program success (). Programs that include only partial components of the Cure Violence Health model, such as efforts in Newark (Boyle 2010b), Pittsburgh (), and New Orleans (), appear not to reduce gun violence or affect other crime-related outcomes.

Impact on Disparities

Likely to decrease disparities

Implementation Examples

Cure Violence Health models have been implemented in 24 cities in California, Delaware, Illinois, Louisiana, Missouri, Maryland, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Puerto Rico, and Texas (Cure Violence).

Implementation Resources

Cure Violence - Cure Violence. Stopping the spread of violence.

Citations - Evidence

* Journal subscription may be required for access.

JHSPH-Webster 2012 - Webster DW, Whitehill JM, Vernick JS, Parker EM. Evaluation of Baltimore's Safe Streets program: Effects on attitudes, participants' experiences, and gun violence. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health (JHSPH); 2012.

Skogan 2008 - Skogan WG, Hartnett SM, Bump N, Dubois J. Evaluation of CeaseFire-Chicago. Rockville: National Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS); 2008.

Boyle 2010b - Boyle DJ, Lanterman JL, Pascarella JE, Cheng CC. The impact of Newark’s Operation Ceasefire on trauma center gunshot wound admissions. Justice Research and Policy. 2010;12(2):105-23.

Wilson 2011b* - Wilson JM, Chermak S. Community-driven violence reduction programs: Examining Pittsburgh’s One Vision One Life. Criminology & Public Policy. 2011;10(4):993-1027.

CCI-Picard-Fritsche 2013 - Picard-Fritsche S, Cerniglia L. Testing a public health approach to gun violence: An evaluation of Crown Heights Save Our Streets, a replication of the Cure Violence model. New York: Center for Court Innovation; 2013.

Butts 2015* - Butts JA, Roman CG, Bostwick L, Porter JR. Cure Violence: A public health model to reduce gun violence. Annual Review of Public Health. 2015;36(1):39–53.

McVey 2014* - McVey E, Duchesne JC, Sarlati S, et al. Operation CeaseFire-New Orleans: An infectious disease model for addressing community recidivism from penetrating trauma. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. 2014;77(1):123–128.

Whitehill 2014* - Whitehill JM, Webster DW, Frattaroli S, Parker EM. Interrupting violence: How the CeaseFire program prevents imminent gun violence through conflict mediation. Journal of Urban Health. 2014;91(1):84–95.

Milam 2016* - Milam AJ, Buggs SA, Furr-Holden CDM, et al. Changes in attitudes toward guns and shootings following implementation of the Baltimore Safe Streets intervention. Journal of Urban Health. 2016;93(4):609-626.

Fox 2015* - Fox AM, Katz CM, Choate DE, Hedberg EC. Evaluation of the Phoenix TRUCE project: A replication of Chicago CeaseFire. Justice Quarterly. 2015;32(1):85-115.

Citations - Implementation Examples

* Journal subscription may be required for access.

Cure Violence - Cure Violence. Stopping the spread of violence.

Date Last Updated

Mar 8, 2017